Hello,

Last week carried a quiet tension between power and process. Institutions moved, sometimes decisively, sometimes without explanation, and the public was left to piece together what changed and why.

Violence surfaced in both private and public places. Accountability felt uneven. In the end, absence, of transparency, of restraint, of trust, spoke as clearly as action.

Let’s dig in.

In today’s edition:

Campus violence and a trail across States

A high-profile case, and an ethics fight at justice

Files removed, questions added at DOJ

A Hollywood killing, and a party’s uneasy public voice

U.S. seizes another oil tanker near Venezuela

Elise Stefanik ends New York governor bid

Campus violence and a trail across States

In Providence, Rhode Island, authorities last week identified Claudio Manuel Neves-Valente as the suspect in a deadly shooting at Brown University that killed two students and wounded nine others during a finals week study session. Days later, investigators linked him to the fatal shooting of Nuno Loureiro, a respected nuclear science professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Federal authorities said Neves-Valente was found dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound in a storage unit in Salem, New Hampshire.

Neves-Valente, a 48-year-old Portuguese national, had briefly studied physics at Brown more than two decades ago before withdrawing. University officials emphasized that he had no current affiliation with the campus. The shooting occurred in the Barus and Holley Building, a long-standing hub for physics and engineering classes. Providence Mayor Brett Smiley said the motive remained unclear.

The victims at Brown were identified as Ella Cook of Alabama and Mukhammad Aziz Umurzokov of Virginia. Six injured students remained hospitalized in stable condition as of Thursday. The campus community, already strained by exams, spent days awaiting answers as students were sent home early and investigators traced a path that crossed state lines and institutions.

A high-profile case, and an ethics fight at justice

In Manhattan, the defense team for Luigi Mangione asked a federal judge to bar prosecutors from seeking the death penalty, arguing that Attorney General Pam Bondi’s involvement created a conflict of interest. Their filing says Bondi previously worked at Ballard Partners, a lobbying firm that represented UnitedHealthcare’s parent company, and that she should have recused herself from decisions in a case tied to the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. According to CNN, the defense argues Bondi also made public comments endorsing execution before key stages of the federal case were complete.

Thompson was shot on December 4 2024 outside a Manhattan hotel as he walked to an investor conference. Mangione was arrested five days later in Altoona, Pennsylvania, and has pleaded not guilty to both federal and state charges. The state case carries a possible life sentence, while the federal case is where prosecutors are pursuing capital punishment.

The defense’s focus is less on the underlying evidence than on the process that brought the case to this posture. They say Bondi broke a pre-office pledge to avoid matters involving Ballard clients for a year, and they claim she continues to receive benefits tied to her past work through financial arrangements with the firm. Prosecutors have pushed back, arguing pretrial publicity and political statements do not automatically invalidate an indictment or a potential penalty. A hearing is scheduled for January 9.

Please click the link below to subscribe to our YouTube channel! Your support means the world to us!

Files removed, questions added at DOJ

Less than a day after the U.S. Justice Department posted thousands of pages of records related to Jeffrey Epstein, at least 16 files quietly vanished from the public webpage, with no advance notice and no immediate explanation. Among the missing materials was an image showing a photograph of Donald Trump alongside Epstein, Melania Trump, and Ghislaine Maxwell, tucked inside a drawer at one of Epstein’s residences. The removal was first noted Saturday, less than 24 hours after the release mandated by Congress. According to the Associated Press, the Justice Department said only that materials would continue to be reviewed and redacted “in an abundance of caution”

The unexplained disappearance immediately reignited skepticism around the long-promised transparency surrounding Epstein’s case. Online speculation spread quickly, amplified by members of Congress. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee publicly questioned why files were removed without notice, asking what else might be missing. For survivors and their advocates, the episode reinforced a familiar pattern: disclosure arrives slowly, unevenly, and often without context.

The broader release itself offered limited new insight. Tens of thousands of pages became searchable for the first time, but many of the most anticipated records were absent. Missing were FBI interviews with victims and internal Justice Department memoranda analyzing charging decisions from the mid-2000s, when federal prosecutors ultimately declined to bring sex trafficking charges. Those gaps, the AP reported, undercut expectations that the disclosure would finally explain how Epstein avoided serious federal consequences for years.

What did emerge was fragmentary. Newly released grand jury transcripts described detailed testimony from girls as young as 14 who said they were paid to perform sexual acts for Epstein. Other records included a 1996 complaint accusing Epstein of stealing photographs of children, and later interviews with former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who cited concerns about jury credibility and legal boundaries when explaining his earlier prosecutorial decisions. Entire documents, including a 119-page grand jury file, were fully blacked out.

Despite a congressional deadline requiring full disclosure, the Justice Department said additional records would be released on a rolling basis, citing the time needed to protect victims’ identities. No timeline was provided.

A Hollywood killing, and a party’s uneasy public voice

On December 14 2025, filmmaker and actor Rob Reiner, 78, and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, 70, were found dead inside their home in Brentwood, Los Angeles. Investigators said the couple suffered multiple sharp-force injuries, and the deaths were ruled homicides. Authorities arrested their son, Nick Reiner, later that day.

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office said Nick Reiner is accused of fatally stabbing both parents in the early morning hours at the home on South Chadbourne Avenue, and that he was arrested hours later in Exposition Park. Prosecutors filed two counts of first-degree murder and alleged a special circumstance of multiple murders, a charging decision that can expand sentencing exposure under California law. The district attorney’s office said a decision on whether to seek the death penalty would be made later.

Nick Reiner, 32, made an initial court appearance this week, and the arraignment was postponed at the defense’s request. Reuters reported that the delay was sought to allow more time for preparation, and noted public acknowledgments of his years-long struggle with addiction. He remains in custody.

The criminal case soon collided with national politics. On December 15 2025, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social suggesting, without evidence, that the killings were connected to Reiner’s criticism of him, calling it “Trump derangement syndrome.” Reuters reported the White House reposted the message on X.

Marjorie Taylor Greene, a close Trump ally, publicly rejected that framing, writing that the deaths were “a family tragedy” and “not about politics or political enemies,” and urging empathy for families dealing with addiction and mental health crises.

The next substantive step is procedural: Nick Reiner’s arraignment is pending following the continuance, and prosecutors have not yet announced whether they will seek capital punishment.

U.S. seizes another oil tanker near Venezuela

On December 20 2025, the U.S. Coast Guard interdicted an oil tanker off Venezuela’s coast in international waters, according to U.S. officials. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem confirmed the operation publicly and tied it to enforcement against the movement of sanctioned oil. ABC News reported it was the second such seizure this month, and noted that a data firm said the vessel involved this time was not on sanctions lists maintained by the U.S., the EU, the U.K., or the U.N.

The operation followed President Trump’s December 16 statement announcing what he called a blockade of sanctioned Venezuelan oil tankers. Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, said the country would continue to trade oil and rejected U.S. pressure as an effort at regime change.

Elise Stefanik ends New York governor bid

On December 20 2025, Representative Elise Stefanik said she was ending her bid for governor of New York and would leave electoral politics, citing family priorities.

Reuters reported she will not seek reelection when her term expires in January 2027, after 12 years in Congress, and said she viewed a protracted Republican primary as an ineffective use of time and resources.

Her campaign had been complicated by the entry of Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman into the primary field. Trump acknowledged Stefanik’s announcement and praised her publicly.

Elon Musk’s net worth now at $700 billion

Elon Musk’s net worth surged after the Delaware Supreme Court reinstated Tesla stock options tied to his compensation package, prompting Forbes to list him as the first person worth more than $700 billion.

The reporting described the reinstated award as a major driver of the increase and linked it to legal battles over a deal first approved years earlier.

The ruling, and its market impact, arrived as investors continue to debate Tesla’s trajectory and Musk’s widening portfolio across technology and defense-adjacent industries. Reuters noted that Musk’s wealth rise placed him far ahead of other billionaires on the same index.

AT&T settlement deadline passes for breach claims

The window for millions of AT&T customers to seek compensation for two major data breaches closed on December 18 2025, marking the end of the claims period for a $177 million class-action settlement tied to years of exposed customer information. The settlement, approved earlier this year by a federal court in Texas, covers two separate incidents in which personal data belonging to current and former customers surfaced online.

The larger of the two incidents dates back to a leak that AT&T disclosed in March 2024, after personal information appeared for sale on the dark web. According to court filings summarized by Business Insider, the compromised data included names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and account passcodes. A second incident involved data that AT&T later acknowledged had been downloaded from a third-party cloud workspace in 2022, exposing call and text metadata for additional customers.

Under the settlement terms, AT&T agreed to fund two separate pools totaling $177 million, $149 million tied to the first breach and $28 million linked to the second. Eligible claimants could seek reimbursement for documented losses, such as identity theft expenses or fraud-related costs, with caps of up to $5,000 for the first incident and $2,500 for the second. Customers affected by both breaches could qualify for combined payments of up to $7,500. AT&T denied wrongdoing but said it agreed to the settlement to avoid prolonged litigation.

The settlement administrator said filing a claim was the only way to receive compensation. Customers who did not submit documentation by the deadline remain bound by the settlement terms but will not receive payments. The court has scheduled a final approval hearing for January 15 2026, at which point distribution timelines may become clearer.

The case sits within a broader pattern of large-scale data breach settlements that offer financial restitution after the fact but do little to reverse the exposure itself. For affected customers, the deadline’s passage closes one administrative chapter, even as questions about long-term data security remain unresolved.

TikTok signs binding deal for U.S. JV

ByteDance signed binding agreements to form a new joint venture that would operate TikTok in the United States, with the stated aim of meeting divestment requirements under U.S. law and avoiding a ban. The Associated Press reported that Oracle and Silver Lake are among the investors, and that the structure would leave the new U.S. entity majority-owned by investors outside ByteDance.

The deal reflects years of political and regulatory pressure focused on data security and algorithm control. According to reporting referenced in the material you provided, the joint venture is expected to hold authority over U.S. data protection and algorithm security functions, with Oracle positioned as a key security partner.

Roomba maker iRobot files for bankruptcy

In mid-December, iRobot, the Bedford, Massachusetts company behind the Roomba robot vacuum, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and said it will be taken private through a court-supervised restructuring led by its primary manufacturer and secured lender, Shenzhen-based Picea Robotics. iRobot said the process is designed to stabilize the business and keep operations running while ownership changes hands.

The filing followed several years of pressure on the company’s core product category. Reuters reported that iRobot has faced intense price competition from lower-cost rivals, many of them Chinese brands, at the same time it was investing heavily in product upgrades and trying to manage a leveraged balance sheet. The company’s position weakened further after its planned acquisition by Amazon, announced in 2022, collapsed in early 2024 amid regulatory opposition, particularly in Europe. The deal’s failure removed a potential lifeline and left iRobot needing to fund its turnaround on harsher terms.

Trade costs also became a factor. Reuters reported that new U.S. tariffs, including levies affecting goods manufactured in Vietnam, added meaningful expense for iRobot in 2025, compounding the strain from falling margins and rising competition.

Under the announced restructuring, Picea is positioned to convert its creditor status into control of the company, while iRobot said other creditors and suppliers are expected to be paid in full. iRobot also told customers to expect no immediate disruption to app functionality, customer service, product support, or partnerships during the court process.

iRobot said it expects to complete the court-supervised restructuring on an accelerated timeline, with the next major step being bankruptcy court approvals in Delaware.

That’s all for this week’s edition of The Briefing.

If you enjoyed this issue, forward it to a friend who likes their news sharp and unsparing. And don’t forget to subscribe to our YouTube channel for daily videos.

— Biswarup Roy Choudhury
Editor, The Briefing

You’re receiving this email because you signed up for our weekly newsletter. Manage your preferences or unsubscribe below.

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up now to get The Briefing in your inbox every Sunday morning.